Formative evaluation is the
process of identifying deficiencies and improvement opportunities in the
instructional materials, and addressing the identified issues and improvement
opportunities to make the instructional materials more effective for the
learners in accomplishing instructional goals.
A formative evaluation plan
is devised to identify specific shortcomings and area of improvements for this
instructional unit with the help of subject matter expert and target learners.
Five data collection instruments (SME notes form, Observation notes form,
Interview protocol, Attitude survey, and Learner performance measure) were
developed to collect a variety of data set. In general, data will be collected
regarding the structure, content, attitude, and learners’ performance to
identify the weakness, inefficiencies, and improvement opportunities for the
instructional unit. Finally, necessary corrective measures will be taken to
revise the instructional unit by utilizing instructional theories and best
practices.
Though initially I thought
formative evaluation is just a concept document; now I can see a clear value of
formative evaluation plan which is helping us to organize our thought to
coordinate and conduct three different kinds of formative evaluations: SME
evaluation, one on one evaluation, and small group evaluation.
Learning project management
process and learning how to work successfully in team set up are two of the
essential skill sets for any profession. To master these skill set one needs
both pedagogical backbone and practical experiences. I am seeing progress from
both of these ends slowly but steadily! Finally, learning is a continuous
journey, not the destination!
Google hangout are becoming
extremely valuable in sharing ideas and building consensus; besides that
document sharing feature is helping us a lot to complement our discussion in a
more efficient and effective way. Asking questions and learning from the
peers and Dr. Weaver is a unique and enlightening experience. I am learning a
lot of different perspectives by watching the screen casts from my peers. These
resources are continuously helping me to think hard and understand new
dimensions of any task at hand. Finally, watching Dr. Weaver’s screen cast
provides a clear guideline on how to deal with so many moving parts without
getting overwhelmed. I would like to apply the techniques I am learning
from Dr. Weaver and my teammates to utilize in my future teaching profession.
My task list for week three:
Task
|
Percent Complete
|
Time
Spent in hrs |
Weekly Group Meeting
|
100%
|
2
|
Contribute to the group discussion in G+
|
100%
|
1
|
Develop Formative evaluation plan
|
60%
|
5
|
Discussion and feedback on formative evaluation plan
|
100%
|
2
|
Update project tasks/sub-tasks in Asana
|
100%
|
.5
|
Keep up with Dr. Weaver's post
|
100%
|
2
|
Discussion and development of Formative Evaluation Instruments
|
30%
|
3
|
Screen-cast Preparation for upcoming screen cast
|
30%
|
1
|
Posted 15/5s for my blog
|
100%
|
.5
|
Developing content in Articulate Storyline2
|
10%
|
4
|
No comments:
Post a Comment